Congress marks up the FY27 budget on May 21. Call now: no restructuring, no glyphosate. Call via 5calls.org →

The Forest Service
Is in Crisis

The Scope of the Changes

The Restructuring

The Forest Service is transitioning from its current regional management model to a state-based one, organized around 15 offices led by state directors. As part of this transition, all nine regional offices will close, with their functions absorbed by new operational service centers. Research activities will be consolidated under a single national research facility in Fort Collins, CO. — Wiley

The Forest Service is also planning to move its headquarters to Salt Lake City, Utah. In addition, 57 of its 77 research facilities are at risk of closure — Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz has confirmed definitive plans to keep 20 open, with the rest under review. — Federal News Network

The Trump administration's FY 2027 budget proposal seeks to merge the wildland firefighting capabilities of the Forest Service and the Interior Department into a single agency. Congress rejected that plan in the FY 2026 spending deal, but directed USDA and Interior to hire an outside group to study its feasibility. — Federal News Network

Workforce Losses

In 2025, the agency lost 5,800 workers nationally. Some national forests in Washington have lost about a quarter of their non-firefighting workforce over the last 14 months. — Washington Trails Association

The Forest Service's main office move from D.C. to Salt Lake City mirrors the USDA's own reorganization in 2025, when an estimated 80% of its staff quit or retired rather than relocate. The restructuring could worsen these employment issues — as one researcher put it: "When you try to move people around, many of them are just not going to go." — Wildfire Today

Budget Cuts

In June 2025, the Trump administration asked Congress to cut Forest Service funding by about $6 billion (67% lower than 2024 enacted levels), including a 60% cut to trail maintenance funding. Congress rejected those cuts in January 2026 and actually increased trail maintenance funding slightly. However, the FY 2027 White House budget proposes cutting recreation, heritage, and wilderness management funding by 31%. — Washington Trails Association

The deputy chief acknowledged that the president's 2027 budget request proposes eliminating research and development funding entirely. — PBS

Projected Losses

Research capacity: Consolidating leadership in Fort Collins will make research harder to do and will move research away from forests and communities — potentially resulting in less impactful work, not more. — OPB

Wildfire preparedness: The loss of research supporting fire prevention and response appears to directly contradict official assurances that wildfire capabilities won't be affected. Local researchers are members of those communities, know the land managers, and understand local fire challenges — that relationship is the real cost of the lab closures. — Wildfire Today

Trails and recreation: The Forest Service's own analysis found that "public access, visitor satisfaction, and recreation-based economic contributions will continue to decline in 2026 and beyond" without investment in the trails program, and that "the agency risks losing decades of investments in trail infrastructure." — Washington Trails Association

Institutional knowledge: The GAO found that after a similar USDA relocation in 2019, the agency put out fewer reports and grant processes slowed. Two years later, staffing and productivity had mostly recovered — but the workforce was primarily composed of newer, less experienced employees. — Wiley

Glyphosate Spraying in Our National Forests

The Trump administration is directing the Forest Service to expand the use of glyphosate — the active ingredient in Roundup — in national forests as part of its broader push to increase timber production and vegetation management on federal lands.

Glyphosate is the world's most widely used herbicide, but its safety is deeply contested. In 2015, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer classified it as "probably carcinogenic to humans." Bayer, which acquired Monsanto (Roundup's manufacturer), has paid more than $10 billion to settle tens of thousands of cancer-related lawsuits in the United States.

Beyond human health concerns, glyphosate has been shown to harm pollinators, disrupt aquatic ecosystems when it reaches waterways, and damage the soil microbiome that forests depend on. Critics argue that expanding its use in national forests — lands managed for the public benefit — directly contradicts the agency's conservation mission and puts hikers, campers, and wildlife at risk.

Since January 2025, the administration has systematically dismantled one of America's most important public institutions. Here's what's at stake — and what's already been lost.

An Economic and Ecological Backbone

193M

acres managed

National forests & grasslands across all 50 states

159M

annual visits

Hikers, skiers, hunters, campers & more

$13.7B

contributed to GDP

From visitor spending alone

161K

jobs sustained

In gateway communities near national forests

20%

of U.S. drinking water

Originates on Forest Service lands — value est. $7.2B/year

11K+

wildland firefighters

The nation's largest federal wildfire response force

Workforce Reductions Since January 2025

4,400

probationary employees fired

NPS & Forest Service combined, Feb 2025 — trail crews, fire support, planners

5,000

more lost to buyouts

Forest Service employees who took the "deferred resignation" offer — about 17% of the workforce

7,000

additional layoffs planned

Forces and early retirements still ahead, per E&E News

26%

staffing cut proposed for FY26

President's budget slashes the Forest Service workforce by over a quarter

$1.4B

cut from FS in FY26 budget

Direct cut to Forest Service activities and research in Trump's budget request

65%

total FS funding cut proposed

Per Sen. Heinrich (D-NM), Ranking Member, Energy & Natural Resources Committee

What This Means on the Ground

Wildfire Risk

Less prevention. Less preparation. More fire.

  • Hazardous fuels reduction at under 50% of FY25 goal — 1.7M of 4M acres treated
  • Plan to spin firefighting into a new agency at Interior — a major reorg happening mid-fire season
  • State fire grants gutted: $76M State Capacity + $21M Volunteer Capacity eliminated
  • ~27% of wildland firefighting positions vacant heading into fire season

Lost Institutional Capacity

Closed offices. Lost research. Flying blind.

  • HQ moves D.C. → Salt Lake City; all 9 regional offices set to close
  • 57 of 77 research stations to close across 31 states — ending decades of forest science data
  • Staff who can't relocate will simply resign — a brain drain of irreplaceable expertise
  • Local decision-making consolidated away from the communities that depend on the land

Local Costs

States and gateway towns left holding the bag.

  • Entire $283M State, Private & Tribal Forestry account zeroed out
  • Fewer rangers, trail crews, and seasonal staff — trails, campgrounds, and visitor services will degrade
  • The Tahoe Basin recreation economy alone supports 15,870 jobs and $1.1B in economic impact
  • Our neighbors and friends — local Forest Service employees — are losing their livelihoods

Mountain and Rural Communities
Are on the Front Lines

01

Wildfire risk goes up when fewer hands are on the ground — and communities like ours in the Sierra Nevada are directly in harm's way.

02

Our local economies depend on healthy public lands and recreation access. When the Forest Service degrades, gateway towns feel it directly.

03

Our neighbors and friends are losing their jobs. Forest Service employees in the Tahoe and Plumas National Forests have been hit hard.

04

Watersheds, wildlife, and the places we love suffer when stewardship is gutted. These are losses we can't undo.

Relevant Coverage

Reporting that documents what's happening to the Forest Service. Share these with your chapter and your neighbors.